Depending on the amount of data to process, file generation may take longer.

If it takes too long to generate, you can limit the data by, for example, reducing the range of years.

Article

Download file Download BibTeX

Title

Slip Risk on Surfaces Made with 3D Printing Technology

Authors

[ 1 ] Instytut Konstrukcji Maszyn, Wydział Inżynierii Mechanicznej, Politechnika Poznańska | [ 2 ] Instytut Maszyn Roboczych i Pojazdów Samochodowych, Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej i Transportu, Politechnika Poznańska | [ P ] employee

Scientific discipline (Law 2.0)

[2.7] Civil engineering, geodesy and transport
[2.9] Mechanical engineering

Year of publication

2025

Published in

Materials

Journal year: 2025 | Journal volume: vol. 18 | Journal number: iss. 3

Article type

scientific article

Publication language

english

Keywords
EN
  • British Portable Skid Resistance Tester (BSRT)
  • Slip Resistance Value (SRV)
  • Polylactic Acid (PLA)
  • Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol (PET-G)
  • Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU)
  • surface roughness
  • 3D printing process parameters
Abstract

EN Slip risk on surfaces used by humans or active in mechanisms is studied to mitigate its effects or harness its beneficial outcomes. This article presents pioneering research on the risk of surfaces created using 3D printing technology. The study examines three materials (Polylactic Acid, PLA; Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol, PET-G; and Thermoplastic Polyurethane, TPU), considering three print head movement directions relative to the British Portable Skid Resistance Tester (BSRT) measurement direction. In addition, surface roughness tests were performed. Dry tests showed that the structure created by the printing direction perpendicular to the movement direction is the safest in terms of slip risk. The SRVs of the measured samples on a qualitative scale were classified on this scale as materials with low or extremely low slip risk (ranging from 55 to 90 SRV dry and 35 to 60 SRV wet). Referring to the influence of the type of material on the SRV, it was found that the safest material in terms of reducing the risk of slipping in dry conditions is TPU and, in wet conditions, PLA. During wet tests, the best properties that reduce the risk of slippage in most cases are shown by the printing direction on a horizontal plane at an angle of 45◦ to the direction of movement. Statistical analysis showed that the printing direction and roughness do not have a statistically significant effect on the SRV, but the type of material and the type of method (dry and wet) and their interaction have a significant effect.

Pages (from - to)

573-1 - 573-17

DOI

10.3390/ma18030573

URL

https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/18/3/573

Comments

Article number: 573

License type

CC BY (attribution alone)

Open Access Mode

open journal

Open Access Text Version

final published version

Date of Open Access to the publication

at the time of publication

Full text of article

Download file

Access level to full text

public

Ministry points / journal

140

This website uses cookies to remember the authenticated session of the user. For more information, read about Cookies and Privacy Policy.