Depending on the amount of data to process, file generation may take longer.

If it takes too long to generate, you can limit the data by, for example, reducing the range of years.

Article

Download file Download BibTeX

Title

Decision Tree Models for Automated Quality Tools Selection

Authors

[ 1 ] Instytut Technologii Materiałów, Wydział Inżynierii Mechanicznej, Politechnika Poznańska | [ P ] employee

Scientific discipline (Law 2.0)

[2.9] Mechanical engineering

Year of publication

2026

Published in

Applied Sciences

Journal year: 2026 | Journal volume: vol. 16 | Journal number: iss. 1

Article type

scientific article

Publication language

english

Keywords
EN
Abstract

EN Quality tools have a well-established place in business management. They help diagnose, analyze, and solve quality problems. In manufacturing companies, they are also used in process and product improvement projects. However, only the proper selection of quality tools can bring tangible benefits to an organization. Given their diverse content and methodologies, supporting the selection of these tools becomes a crucial issue. A literature review indicates only a few solutions in this area, implemented as decision support systems. Additionally, the challenges of Quality 4.0 and the demands of modern business reveal a research gap in automating the process of selecting quality tools. This is particularly true for less experienced company employees participating in improvement programs. Our previous research shows how machine learning using neural network models supports the development of an expert system in this area. The aim of this paper is to present the results of research conducted in which classifiers in the form of decision trees were developed. At the same time, attempts were made to demonstrate that decision tree classifiers (on an extended Excellence Toolbox dataset) can automatically recommend qualitative tools with an accuracy better than neural networks, while offering interpretable rules. The decision-tree models achieve strong classification performance, with the best tree reporting 96.75% effectiveness. In contrast, the neural network from previous studies achieved 94.87%.

Date of online publication

02.01.2026

Pages (from - to)

472-1 - 472-15

DOI

10.3390/app16010472

URL

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/16/1/472

Comments

Article Number: 472

License type

CC BY (attribution alone)

Open Access Mode

open journal

Open Access Text Version

final published version

Date of Open Access to the publication

at the time of publication

Full text of article

Download file

Access level to full text

public

Ministry points / journal

100

This website uses cookies to remember the authenticated session of the user. For more information, read about Cookies and Privacy Policy.