Depending on the amount of data to process, file generation may take longer.

If it takes too long to generate, you can limit the data by, for example, reducing the range of years.

Article

Download file Download BibTeX

Title

Comparison of Machine Learning Models to Predict Risk of Falling in Osteoporosis Elderly

Authors

Year of publication

2020

Published in

Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences

Journal year: 2020 | Journal volume: vol. 45 | Journal number: no. 2

Article type

scientific article

Publication language

english

Keywords
EN
  • GaitRite data
  • prognosis falls
  • computational methods
  • osteoporosis
Abstract

EN Falls are a multifactorial cause of injuries for older people. Subjects with osteoporosis are more vulnerable to falls. The focus of this study is to investigate the performance of the different machine learning models built on spatiotemporal gait parameters to predict falls particularly in subjects with osteoporosis. Spatiotemporal gait parameters and prospective registration of falls were obtained from a sample of 110 community dwelling older women with osteoporosis (age 74.3 ± 6.3) and 143 without osteoporosis (age 68.7 ± 6.8). We built four different models, Support Vector Machines, Neuronal Networks, Decision Trees, and Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBN), for each specific set of parameters used, and compared them considering their accuracy, precision, recall and F-score to predict fall risk. The F-score value shows that DBN based models are more efficient to predict fall risk, and the best result obtained is when we use a DBN model using the experts’ variables with FSMC’s variables, mixed variables set, obtaining an accuracy of 80%, and recall of 73%. The results confirm the feasibility of computational methods to complement experts’ knowledge to predict risk of falling within a period of time as high as 12 months.

Pages (from - to)

65 - 77

DOI

10.2478/fcds-2020-0005

URL

https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478%2Ffcds-2020-0005

License type

CC BY-NC-ND (attribution - noncommercial - no derivatives)

Full text of article

Download file

Access level to full text

public

Ministry points / journal

20

Ministry points / journal in years 2017-2021

40

This website uses cookies to remember the authenticated session of the user. For more information, read about Cookies and Privacy Policy.