Depending on the amount of data to process, file generation may take longer.

If it takes too long to generate, you can limit the data by, for example, reducing the range of years.

Article

Download BibTeX

Title

Analogies Between Finite-Difference and Finite-Element Methods for Scalar and Vector Potential Formulations in Magnetic Field Calculations

Authors

[ 1 ] Instytut Elektrotechniki i Elektroniki Przemysłowej, Wydział Elektryczny, Politechnika Poznańska | [ P ] employee

Year of publication

2016

Published in

IEEE Transactions on Magnetics

Journal year: 2016 | Journal volume: vol. 52 | Journal number: iss. 6

Article type

scientific article

Publication language

english

Keywords
EN
  • edge-element method (EEM)
  • finite-difference methods (FDMs)
  • finite-element analysis
  • magnetic fields
Abstract

EN Numerical 3-D formulations using scalar Ω and vector A potentials are examined for magnetic fields with an emphasis on the finite-difference method (FDM) and finite-element method (FEM) using nodal and facet elements. It is shown that for hexahedral elements, the FDM equations may be presented in a form similar to the FEM equations; to accomplish this, the coefficients defining volume integrals in the FEM need to be expressed in an approximate manner, while the nodes in the FDM require supplementary association with middle points of edges, facets, and volumes. The analogy between a description of magnetic field sources arising from the classical MMF distribution approach, and when expressed in terms of edge values of vector potential, T 0 is emphasized. Comparisons are made between the results obtained using the FDM and the FEM for both the scalar and vector potential formulations. Forces in systems containing permanent magnets and torques in permanent magnet machines are calculated and compared using both the approaches for scalar and vector formulations. A unified form of the stress tensor has been applied to the FDM and FEM.

Pages (from - to)

700420-1 - 700420-6

DOI

10.1109/TMAG.2016.2521345

URL

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7390276

Ministry points / journal

25

Impact Factor

1,243

This website uses cookies to remember the authenticated session of the user. For more information, read about Cookies and Privacy Policy.