Depending on the amount of data to process, file generation may take longer.

If it takes too long to generate, you can limit the data by, for example, reducing the range of years.

Article

Download file Download BibTeX

Title

Ensemble Deep Learning Ultimate Tensile Strength Classification Model for Weld Seam of Asymmetric Friction Stir Welding

Authors

[ 1 ] Instytut Logistyki, Wydział Inżynierii Zarządzania, Politechnika Poznańska | [ P ] employee

Scientific discipline (Law 2.0)

[6.6] Management and quality studies

Year of publication

2023

Published in

Processes

Journal year: 2023 | Journal volume: vol. 11 | Journal number: iss. 2

Article type

scientific article

Publication language

english

Keywords
EN
  • ensemble deep learning
  • convolution neural network (CNN)
  • nondestructive testing
  • friction stir welding (FSW)
  • ultimate tensile strength (UTS)
Abstract

EN Friction stir welding is a material processing technique used to combine dissimilar and similar materials. Ultimate tensile strength (UTS) is one of the most common objectives of welding, especially friction stir welding (FSW). Typically, destructive testing is utilized to measure the UTS of a welded seam. Testing for the UTS of a weld seam typically involves cutting the specimen and utilizing a machine capable of testing for UTS. In this study, an ensemble deep learning model was developed to classify the UTS of the FSW weld seam. Consequently, the model could classify the quality of the weld seam in relation to its UTS using only an image of the weld seam. Five distinct convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were employed to form the heterogeneous ensemble deep learning model in the proposed model. In addition, image segmentation, image augmentation, and an efficient decision fusion approach were implemented in the proposed model. To test the model, 1664 pictures of weld seams were created and tested using the model. The weld seam UTS quality was divided into three categories: below 70% (low quality), 70–85% (moderate quality), and above 85% (high quality) of the base material. AA5083 and AA5061 were the base materials used for this study. The computational results demonstrate that the accuracy of the suggested model is 96.23%, which is 0.35% to 8.91% greater than the accuracy of the literature’s most advanced CNN model.

Date of online publication

01.02.2023

Pages (from - to)

434-1 - 434-28

DOI

10.3390/pr11020434

URL

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020434

Comments

Article number: 434

License type

CC BY (attribution alone)

Open Access Mode

open journal

Open Access Text Version

final published version

Release date

01.02.2023

Date of Open Access to the publication

at the time of publication

Full text of article

Download file

Access level to full text

public

Ministry points / journal

100

Impact Factor

3,5 [List 2022]

This website uses cookies to remember the authenticated session of the user. For more information, read about Cookies and Privacy Policy.