Depending on the amount of data to process, file generation may take longer.

If it takes too long to generate, you can limit the data by, for example, reducing the range of years.

Article

Download BibTeX

Title

Properties of fairness measures in the context of varying class imbalance and protected group ratios

Authors

[ 1 ] Instytut Informatyki, Wydział Informatyki i Telekomunikacji, Politechnika Poznańska | [ P ] employee | [ S ] student

Scientific discipline (Law 2.0)

[2.3] Information and communication technology

Year of publication

2024

Published in

ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data

Journal year: 2024 | Journal volume: vol. 18 | Journal number: iss. 7

Article type

scientific article

Publication language

english

Keywords
EN
  • group fairness
  • class imbalance
  • protected group imbalance
Abstract

EN Society is increasingly relying on predictive models in fields like criminal justice, credit risk management, or hiring. To prevent such automated systems from discriminating against people belonging to certain groups, fairness measures have become a crucial component in socially relevant applications of machine learning. However, existing fairness measures have been designed to assess the bias between predictions for protected groups without considering the imbalance in the classes of the target variable. Current research on the potential effect of class imbalance on fairness focuses on practical applications rather than dataset-independent measure properties. In this paper, we study the general properties of fairness measures for changing class and protected group proportions. For this purpose, we analyze the probability mass functions of six of the most popular group fairness measures. We also measure how the probability of achieving perfect fairness changes for varying class imbalance ratios. Moreover, we relate the dataset-independent properties of fairness measures described in this paper to classifier fairness in real-life tasks. Our results show that measures such as Equal Opportunity and Positive Predictive Parity are more sensitive to changes in class imbalance than Accuracy Equality. These findings can help guide researchers and practitioners in choosing the most appropriate fairness measures for their classification problems.

Date of online publication

28.03.2024

Pages (from - to)

170-1 - 170-18

DOI

10.1145/3654659

URL

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3654659

Comments

Article Number: 170

Ministry points / journal

100

Impact Factor

4 [List 2023]

This website uses cookies to remember the authenticated session of the user. For more information, read about Cookies and Privacy Policy.