Depending on the amount of data to process, file generation may take longer.

If it takes too long to generate, you can limit the data by, for example, reducing the range of years.

Article

Download BibTeX

Title

Multi-objective optimization for electric discharge drilling of waspaloy: A comparative analysis of NSGA-II, MOGA, MOGWO, and MOPSO

Authors

[ 1 ] Instytut Technologii Mechanicznej, Wydział Inżynierii Mechanicznej, Politechnika Poznańska | [ P ] employee

Scientific discipline (Law 2.0)

[2.9] Mechanical engineering

Year of publication

2024

Published in

Alexandria Engineering Journal

Journal year: 2024 | Journal volume: vol. 99

Article type

scientific article

Publication language

english

Keywords
EN
  • Electrical Discharge Drilling
  • Waspaloy
  • NSGA-II
  • MOPSO
  • MOGA
  • ANOVA
Abstract

EN This study investigates the impact of pulse-on-time (TON), current (I), pulse-off-time (TOFF), voltage (V), and tool electrode speed (TES) on material removal rate (MRR), average surface roughness (Ra), power consumption (PC) and surface defects for electrical discharge drilling (EDD) of Waspaloy. Based on a Taguchi design with five factors and four levels, experimental trials reveal TOFF, TON, and TOFF as the most influential factors, contributing 50.45%, 34.29%, and 33.09% to MRR, Ra, and PC, respectively. To address conflicting conditions and optimize responses, non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II), multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA), multi-objective grey wolf optimizer (MOGWO), and multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) are employed. Comparative analysis of 8 optimal solutions provided by four optimization techniques, which exhibit less than 10% errors in confirmatory experiments, has been done, ensuring better prediction accuracy. MOPSO is preferable to the rest of the optimization techniques due to its lower percentage error. NSGA-II, MOGA, MOGWO, and MOPSO exhibit relative improvement in responses based on confirmatory experiments, establishing them as effective tools for exploring EDD applications. Higher current is confirmed as a primary contributor to increased surface damage through microscopic image analysis, and EDX analysis exposes carbon deposition migration on both the tool and workpiece.

Date of online publication

09.05.2024

Pages (from - to)

1 - 16

DOI

10.1016/j.aej.2024.04.049

URL

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016824004289

License type

CC BY-NC-ND (attribution - noncommercial - no derivatives)

Open Access Mode

open journal

Open Access Text Version

final published version

Date of Open Access to the publication

in press

Ministry points / journal

70

Impact Factor

6,8 [List 2022]

This website uses cookies to remember the authenticated session of the user. For more information, read about Cookies and Privacy Policy.