Depending on the amount of data to process, file generation may take longer.

If it takes too long to generate, you can limit the data by, for example, reducing the range of years.

Article

Download file Download BibTeX

Title

On-Board Crowd Counting and Density Estimation Using Low Altitude Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Looking beyond Beating the Benchmark

Authors

[ 1 ] Wydział Automatyki, Robotyki i Elektrotechniki, Politechnika Poznańska | [ 2 ] Instytut Robotyki i Inteligencji Maszynowej, Wydział Automatyki, Robotyki i Elektrotechniki, Politechnika Poznańska | [ SzD ] doctoral school student | [ P ] employee

Scientific discipline (Law 2.0)

[2.2] Automation, electronics, electrical engineering and space technologies

Year of publication

2022

Published in

Remote Sensing

Journal year: 2022 | Journal volume: vol. 14 | Journal number: iss. 10

Article type

scientific article

Publication language

english

Keywords
EN
  • deep learning
  • crowd counting
  • image processing
  • edge processing
  • embedded
  • UAV
Abstract

EN Recent advances in deep learning-based image processing have enabled significant improvements in multiple computer vision fields, with crowd counting being no exception. Crowd counting is still attracting research interest due to its potential usefulness for traffic and pedestrian stream monitoring and analysis. This study considered a specific case of crowd counting, namely, counting based on low-altitude aerial images collected by an unmanned aerial vehicle. We evaluated a range of neural network architectures to find ones appropriate for on-board image processing using edge computing devices while minimising the loss in performance. Through experiments on a range of neural network architectures, we also showed that the input image resolution significantly impacts the prediction quality and should be considered an important factor before going for a more complex neural network model to improve accuracy. Moreover, by extending a state-of-the-art benchmark with more in-depth testing, we showed that larger models might be prone to overfitting because of the relative scarcity of training data.

Pages (from - to)

2288-1 - 2288-18

DOI

10.3390/rs14102288

URL

https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/10/2288/htm

Comments

Article number: 2288

License type

CC BY (attribution alone)

Open Access Mode

open journal

Open Access Text Version

final published version

Release date

10.05.2022

Date of Open Access to the publication

at the time of publication

Full text of article

Download file

Access level to full text

public

Ministry points / journal

100

Impact Factor

5

This website uses cookies to remember the authenticated session of the user. For more information, read about Cookies and Privacy Policy.